1. What is swine flu?
It’s a new strain of Influenza A, coming from a pig. The pig has contracted one human strain, two pig strains, and one bird strain of the flu. These all combined to make a new strain. Pigs are a Grand Central Station for flu and other viruses.

2. What are the symptoms?
They’re similar to regular flu viruses, but the gastrointestinal symptoms are more severe. They include:

• Severe fatigue
• Headache
• Sore throat
• Nasal congestion
• Vomiting
• Diarrhea
• Nausea
  *Keep in mind regular flu season is over, so if you are experiencing flu-like symptoms, call your doctor. Do NOT go to the ER.

3. How do you get it?
Mostly by infected people coughing/sneezing around you, also passing it by touch is likely.

4. How is it passed?
You can pass it on to other people by coughing/sneezing on or near them, and possibly even touching surfaces that they later touch (and then touch their face, eyes, nose, etc.).

5. How is it treated?
There’s no ‘cure’ for it, but you need:

• Isolation/Rest
• Fluids
• Keep fever down
• Consider anti-viral drugs such as Tamiflu and Relenza, but keep in mind this strain is resistant to many older anti-viral drugs.

6. How do you protect yourself?

• Frequent hand-washing
• Avoid sick people
• Don’t cough or sneeze on others
• Stay home if you’re sick!

7. Can you catch it from eating pork products?
While people in Mexico likely contracted this from handling infected pigs, eating pork products should be safe. Keep in mind to cook pork to a temperature of 160° Fahrenheit to kill any viruses.

8. Is traveling safe?
Travel to Mexico is still statistically quite safe; the problem is still mainly one of perception, as the actual risk remains low. I would also consider the psychological effects this could have on children; consider what precautions they might take at airports, with customs officers wearing masks, etc.

9. How long does it last?
The virus can incubate a day or two before symptoms occur. It takes about a week to recover from the full-blown virus.

10. Is this real or hype? Do I need to be worried?
The danger is getting a lot of hype, but it is real. You probably don’t need to be worried, though.

Dr. Marc Siegel is an internist and associate professor of medicine at the NYU School of Medicine. He is a FOX News medical contributor and writes a health column for LA Times, where he examines TV and movies for medical accuracy. Dr. Siegel is the author of “False Alarm: The Truth About the Epidemic of Fear“ and “Bird Flu: Everything You Need to Know About the Next Pandemic.”  Read more at www.doctorsiegel.com

In the past few years, researchers have studied whether eating certain foods actually prevents disease.  Scientists have begun to identify thousands of natural chemicals in foods that seem to have preventative powers.  These aren’t just vitamins and minerals, they are phytochemicals.

Below are 6 foods that pack a nutritional punch.  When used correctly they may have the power to prevent all kinds of serious ailments, including heart disease, diabetes and even cancer.

1. Fiber: Fiber helps to lower cholesterol, reducing risk factors for cardiovascular disease.  Researchers at the University of California have said that fiber also reduces the risk factors for colon cancer and breast cancer.  Fiber also helps control blood sugar levels, which is important for diabetics.  Lastly, diets high in fiber help to keep you feeling full on few calories which will lead to weight loss.

2. Tomatoes: Tomatoes are high in lycopene- which is one of the most powerful antioxidants.  Lycopene mops up free radicals thus reducing the risk for prostate cancer.  Lycopene is best released from cooking tomatoes, so ketchup and tomato sauces are great sources. Tomatoes are also a great source of vitamin C.

3. Salmon: Salmon has lots of omega- 3 fatty acids which help the heart. Omega- 3s prevent platelets in the blood from clumping together and sticking to arterial walls in the form of plaque.  They also drive down triglycerides and LDL cholesterol.  Researchers suspect that omega- 3’s may block the production of inflammatory substances linked to arthritis and lupus and may even help fight against Alzheimer’s.  That’s because omega 3’s interact with the fatty layers that surround brain cells and may help protect them.

4. Spinach:  This vegetable is oaded with iron and folate.  Folate lowers blood levels of homocysteine, an amino acid that irritates blood vessels and is linked to heart disease.  Spinach also contains two phytochemicals that ward off macular degeneration, a leading cause of blindness.  One cup has 41 calories, which means you don’t have to worry about excess calories.

5. Blueberries: Out of all fruits and vegetables blueberries have the most antioxidants per serving.  Blueberries contain a phytochemical called anthocyanins that reduce risk factors for cancer and cardiovascular disease and may boost brain power as well.  In a recent study, rats were fed blueberry extract for 9 weeks.  Those that were fed the extract performed better as tasks such as navigating mazes and memory tests.  Another blueberry benefit, like cranberries, they seem to fight urinary tract infections.

6. Pistachios:  They are loaded with fat and can be salty but these filling little snack foods are nutritional powerhouses.  Nuts are high in monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, which help to lower triglycerides and LDL cholesterol (bad cholesterol) while raising HDL levels(good cholesterol), thus reducing the risk factors for heart disease.  Pistachios are also a good source of Vitamin E which is a potent antioxidant that may help ward off cancer.  The downside? At about 160 calories per ounce, they are a sure ticket to the fat farm.  Eat them by the handful, not bowlful.

Tanya Zuckerbrot, MS, RD is a nutritionist and founder of Skinnyandthecity.com.    She is also the creator of The F-Factor Diet™, an innovative nutritional program she has used for more than ten years to provide hundreds of her clients with all the tools they need to achieve easy weight loss and maintenance, improved health and well-being.  For more information log onto www.FFactorDiet.com.

If swine flu weren’t such a serious problem, I would have found it humorous when pork companies began demanding that we change the name of the virus to H1N1. People without a vested interest in pork might also consider that a good idea from the point of view of decreasing fear (pigs are slimy ugly creatures that make loud scary noises), until they discover that H1N1 was also the designation of the 1918 Spanish flu that killed over 50 million people worldwide.

Speaking of flu fears fed by the specter of 1918, have a look at my oped in Monday’s NY Post. I also want to provide you some with some flu-prevention tips:

• Wash your hands often and don’t cough or sneeze on people or wipe your hands on common surfaces — not because of swine flu, but to prevent the spread of any respiratory virus.
• If you are suffering from lethargy, high fever, muscle aches, headache, sore throat or nausea, call your physician. He or she can help you determine if you need to be tested for flu. Do not go to your local emergency room with mild or moderate symptoms because our ERs are already becoming clogged with patients with colds and allergies.
• If you are one of the rare people who have had contact with an actual case or possible case of swine flu, also contact your physician.
• Listen to public health announcements coming from our federal, state, and local officials, but consider that they may also see their role as describing the worst case scenario. Learn to diffuse the language of fear. Risk assessment needs to be rational. Be reassured that this appears to be a weak virus, that it is not spreading rapidly, and mostly that it doesn’t seem to be very deadly.
• Isolating sick people and their contacts is the best way to contain an emerging virus, not to quarantine entire regions. It is doubtful that travel restrictions will help at this point, and closing the border may be counterproductive, as panicked sick people will likely try to escape (as has occurred historically).

Dr. Marc Siegel is an internist and associate professor of medicine at the NYU School of Medicine. He is a FOX News medical contributor and writes a health column for LA Times, where he examines TV and movies for medical accuracy. Dr. Siegel is the author of “False Alarm: The Truth About the Epidemic of Fear“ and “Bird Flu: Everything You Need to Know About the Next Pandemic.”  Read more at www.doctorsiegel.com

Dear Yvonne,
Can being selfish with your time improve your sex life?
—Kip

Dear Kip,
It’s healthy for lovers not to be codependent upon one another, especially when it comes to capitalizing eachother’s time. They’re stronger together when they’re still individuals vs. morphed into at 24/7 situation that causes both of them to be stagnate. When lovers can pursue their own interests and have their own downtime, that shows a comfort and security with the relationship that is attractive. Time spent on their own interests allows them to grow, inviting newness into the relationship.

Second, being too available is a turn off. If lovers spend even a day, for example, she’s having cocktails with girlfriends at a sex toy party while he’s at a horse race, apart, this acts like a hurdle, which can be a turn on. It’s far short of Romeo and Juliet, but it has a similar effect.

Dr. Yvonne Kristín Fulbright is a sex educator, relationship expert, columnist and founder of Sexuality Source Inc. She is the author of several books including, “Touch Me There! A Hands-On Guide to Your Orgasmic Hot Spots.”

There may be two months left before school lets out, but now is the time to start planning your child’s summer activities. Many people long for the days when a parent opened the front door in the morning, wished their child a good day, and got a happy (often slightly dirty) child in return at the end of a long, hot summer day.

There are a number of reasons this occurs less often these days, including a heightened awareness or rise in crime, children’s need for structure, and parents taking a more active role in educating their children. Summer is now seen as a time for cognitive as well as physical growth and offers two solid months to prepare your child for the upcoming school year.  Whatever your reason for sending your child to summer camp, there are a few things you should consider before sending in your payment.

• Decide what you are looking for in a camp. Does your child need academic reinforcement or opportunities for social exchange? Is your child ready for sleep-away camp or is a day camp more appropriate? Identify your child’s needs first, then look for the camp that fits your criteria. The number of available camps can be overwhelming, so choose the one or two of the most important criteria, and then match your needs to what the camps offer. For example, if your child has special needs, finding staff that is trained in supporting those needs will be the most important criteria. If your child is struggling with reading, finding a camp that matches your school’s approach to reading should be high on your list of criteria. Sending your child to a camp just because his friends are attending does not guarantee a positive experience.
• Once you’ve identified what you are looking for in a camp, ask other parents for references.  As specific questions about the camp such as the price, length of day, and staff-to-camper ratio. Also ask questions like “If you could change one thing about this camp, what would it be?” or “Why do you feel comfortable sending your child here?” Ask the camper about her experience as well. Ask who is her favorite staffer and why, what is her favorite activity, and if she would change camps and why or why not. Getting others’ opinions does not ensure your child’s experience will be flawless but it will give you information about the camp not found in the brochure.
• Once you have narrowed down your search, visit the camps that have made your final list. Pay attention to how the counselors interact with the campers and how the children respond. Spend a significant amount of time at the camp (at least 2 hours) so you can observe different types of activities, transitions between activities, and see all of the facilities. Ask to see the cafeteria, the bunks, the nurse’s station, the pool, and any other spaces your child will be using. Ask about important protocols, such as how a child reports an injury and gets treated, the camp’s emergency response plan (for a camp-wide crisis such as fires or responding to an intruder), and how and when your child can contact you. These questions will help you feel more confident in sending your child to someone else’s care and gives you time to discuss the procedures with your child.
• If you choose an academic camp, speak with your child’s current teacher as well as the teacher he will have in the fall. Some camps have forms they will ask you or your child’s teacher to fill out regarding current academic progress and areas that need support. Make sure your child is staying on target by asking for weekly reports from camp and work samples. Ask for activities you can do with your child at home to strengthen the camp-school connection. 

Remember to prepare your child for the camp they will be attending. Be clear about the activities they will be participating in and be sensitive to their concerns. Most children will be apprehensive about doing academic work during the summer, so remember to schedule some fun family activities and play dates as well.

Cost can be another factor in choosing a camp. Some camps or community organizations offer scholarships. Don’t be embarrassed to ask the camp director about the possibility of financial assistance.

Choosing the right camp for your child can create a lot of pressure for you and your spouse. Allow your child’s needs to guide you as you search for the right summer experience for her. Remember, camp is supposed to be an enjoyable and memorable time so don’t forget to pack bug spray, plenty of clothes, and a camera as you send her on her way this summer!

Jennifer Cerbasi teaches at a public school for children on the autism spectrum in New Jersey. As a coordinator of Applied Behavioral Analysis programs in the home, she works with parents to create and implement behavioral plans for their children in an environment that fosters both academic and social growth. In addition to her work both in the classroom and at home, she is also a member of the National Association of Special Education Teachers and the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Last week, I published an oped in the Wall Street Journal where I pointed out that extending health insurance (especially with a government option) to the entire population would be problematic unless the problem of doctors opting out of insurance under the current system is addressed.

In other words, health insurance doesn’t automatically mean health care, especially if you lack the caretakers to accept it.

This oped produced a firestorm of responses, from  letters to the Journal to hundreds of responses to the WSJ blog which published an abbreviated version, to hundreds of emails to my personal account. I discussed my oped on Fox News and Fox Business. Most of the responses were positive, and Rush Limbaugh read my oped on his radio show and praised it. The NY State Commissioner of Health is going to meet with me to discuss ideas.

Among my critics, some people lost sight of the point that I have not dropped Medicare myself, in fact I pointed out in the article that I take care of many Medicare patients who have left other doctors they were happy with because they dropped out.

Another criticism was that I don’t provide solutions. That is a fair comment, though my father always taught me that a person’s first responsibility is to identify a problem before considering solutions. In any case, here are some preliminary ideas that could help primary care doctors and keep them from opting out of an expanding system:

* Subsidize education and provide incentives for choosing primary care medicine as a career.
* Provide tax incentives for seeing Medicaid and perhaps Medicare patients.
* Do NOT take Medicaid funding away from hospitals to increase reimbursement to private physicians because this will have little impact and because taking care of Medicaid patients – who are often the sickest due to poverty – requires the kind of network you only find at the hospital and associated out-patient clinics.
* Increase physician reimbursement and decrease paperwork.
* Consider a system where insurance is less pervasive and is focused more on prevention and emergencies, with high deductibles to discourage overuse. The middle ground between prevention and emergency intervention can involve negotiated prices between doctor and patient, the way it used to be. Health Savings Accounts should also be considered.

Dr. Marc Siegel is an internist and associate professor of medicine at the NYU School of Medicine. He is a FOX News medical contributor and writes a health column for LA Times, where he examines TV and movies for medical accuracy. Dr. Siegel is the author of “False Alarm: The Truth About the Epidemic of Fear“ and “Bird Flu: Everything You Need to Know About the Next Pandemic.”  Read more at www.doctorsiegel.com

Dear Yvonne,
I masturbate daily. Will this affect my sperm count in any way?
—Anonymous

Dear Anonymous,
Self-pleasuring to the point of emission on a daily basis does not reduce your sperm count. Research actually indicates that it may, in fact, increase a man’s virility. In producing ejaculation, a male’s testes produce and store sperm continuously from the time he hits puberty.

Dr. Yvonne Kristín Fulbright is a sex educator, relationship expert, columnist and founder of Sexuality Source Inc. She is the author of several books including, “Touch Me There! A Hands-On Guide to Your Orgasmic Hot Spots.”

Philip Markoff, the 22-year-old accused Craigslist killer of model Julissa Brisman, may seem like the least likely of killers.  But when all the facts are known, Markoff’s story (if he is convicted) will start to make sense.  Granted, he’s a reasonably affable medical student without a criminal record ― but Scott Peterson was a friendly fellow and seemingly good neighbor before murdering his wife Laci and their unborn son, Conner.  Dr. Richard Sharpe,  the Harvard dermatologist (and cross-dresser, it turns out) was a respected physician prior to shooting his wife to death in front of their children.  Dr. Jonathan Kappler, a California anesthesiologist who murdered my friend and colleague Paul Mendelson back in 1990, had worked for decades as an anesthesiologist prior to accelerating to 60 mph in his car and intentionally mowing Paul down as he jogged. 
 
Psychiatric instability is often invisible until we look for it, in retrospect, after a terrible event triggers the inquiry.  But the evidence of that instability and the causes of it are never absent once we start digging. 
 
In the case of Philip Markoff, we could start excavating the roots of his violence by looking at his gambling habit.  If it is true that he owed gambling debts that motivated him to rob women-for-hire in hotel rooms, then he may have been someone deeply moved by the wheels of fate — by risk or ruin being determined by the alchemy of skill and the luck of the draw at a poker table.  In my experience treating gamblers, their connection to fate often comes from having little or no control over their lives as much younger people.  Sometimes, that adds up to having had parents who could have cared less about their feelings or desires. Sometimes, it adds up to not knowing when the next beating was going to come. And sometimes, it adds up to too many sudden losses. 
 
But it always adds up. When someone shoots a woman, then calmly walks to his car sending off text messages, he is unmoved by the cruelest roulette life can serve up.  Somewhere deep inside him, he is used to destruction because he has been destroyed.  He is without feelings because he has tried desperately to wall off his own — whether fear or grief or rage.
 
If I were with Markoff right now, I’d want to know why gambling spoke to him.  Why was Foxwoods the kind of place he felt at home?  Why was it the place he reportedly planned to marry his fiancé? 
 
Markoff also allegedly preyed upon women.  He didn’t pistol whip drug dealers and make off with their cash.  Maybe, if he’s guilty, he’s had it in for women.  Maybe he harbors deep feelings that his life was “stolen” from him with the dissolution of his parents’ marriage and its aftermath.  Maybe he thinks they’re all prostitutes when it really comes down to it.  Maybe he thinks they’re dangerous enough to him emotionally ― or even physically ― that they need to be tied up.  We don’t know — yet.  We never know, until we ask the relevant psychological questions.
 
I’ve been a forensic psychiatrist now for many years.  And I’ve learned one thing for sure:  No killer comes out of the blue.  No child is born into this world evil.  Every act of destructiveness can be explained.  And no one, not even a medical student whose fiancé loves him very much, is ultimately much of a mystery once you decide to burrow beneath the surface.

Dr. Keith Ablow is a psychiatry correspondent for FOX News Channel and a New York Times bestselling author. His newest book, “Living the Truth: Transform Your Life through the Power of Insight and Honesty” has launched a new self-help movement. Check out Dr. Ablow’s website at livingthetruth.com or e-mail him at info@keithablow.com.

Q: Is canned salmon, just as nutritious as the fresh kind?

A: On the downside, canned salmon contains more than six times as much sodium — 399 milligrams per 100 grams (about 3.5 ounces) as fresh salmon. Regrettably, some of the heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids that salmon is praised for get lost in the canning process, so canned salmon has only about half the total amount of the two most important omega-3s EPA and DHA.

However, canned salmon contains many additional beneficial nutrients, not found in their fresh counterparts. The differences develop from how canned fish is processed, and from the fact that bones are included. One 3.5 ounce serving with bones contains two thirds as much calcium as a cup of milk, making this product one of the most calcium-rich, non-dairy foods. Canned salmon also has more vitamin D and phosphorus per serving than fresh salmon. Both canned and fresh salmon give you roughly the same amount of protein, 22-23 grams per 100 grams.
The American Heart Association recommends eating fish 3 times a week to reduce the risk for cardiovascular disease. Despite the fact that you’ll need to eat it more frequently to get enough omega-3s canned salmon can be a delicious and nutritious part of any diet. In addition, canned salmon costs less per serving than fresh, and canned products are an economically wise choice because they have a long shelf life. 

Below is a delectable recipe for you to enjoy:

Salmon Burgers
Ingredients:
• 1 14.75 – ounce can salmon
• 3-4 tablespoons Dijon mustard
• ¼ cup reduced- fat mayonnaise
• 3 tablespoons parsley
• 1/2 cup sliced green onions
• 2-3 tablespoons minced garlic
• ½ teaspoon salt
• ½ teaspoon pepper
• Pam nonstick cooking spray
• 4 Whole-wheat sandwich rolls
• lettuce
• tomato
•  onion

Directions:
1. Blend salmon, Dijon mustard, mayonnaise and parsley in a mixer.
2. Pour mixture into a bowl and add green onions, garlic, salt and pepper.
3. Form into four 1/2 – inch-thick burgers and chill for 2-3 hours.
4. Spray skillet with nonstick cooking spray over medium heat ,and sauté salmon burgers for 3 minutes per side or until cooked through.
5. Serve on tasted Whole Wheat Hamburger buns and top with lettuce, tomato and onion.

Serves 4

Nutrition Content:
Per Serving: 310 calories, 11g fat, 26g carbohydrate, 4g fiber, 27g protein, 1014mg sodium

Tanya Zuckerbrot, MS, RD is a nutritionist and founder of Skinnyandthecity.com.    She is also the creator of The F-Factor Diet™, an innovative nutritional program she has used for more than ten years to provide hundreds of her clients with all the tools they need to achieve easy weight loss and maintenance, improved health and well-being.  For more information log onto www.FFactorDiet.com.

Dear Yvonne,
I’m a 33-year-old male who just can’t seem to land a relationship. I think I suffer from “nice guy syndrome.” I consider myself a pretty decent-looking guy. But every time I meet someone, it always starts out great and in a matter of weeks, I find that I must’ve done something to ruin things. I don’t understand what I do wrong, and I get myself down thinking I must be some kind of loser or something. Can you help?
Thank you in advance,
—Derek

Dear Derek,
What you need to do first and foremost is work on your self-esteem. I’m concerned that you are automatically blaming yourself for a relationship gone sour. What makes you think that you’ve necessarily done something wrong? Two people don’t stay together for a number of reasons that aren’t personal, and parting ways doesn’t always come down to one person doing something undesirable. What is unattractive, however, is having a “loser” attitude. If you feel like a loser, then that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

If you think something about yourself long enough, then that can become engrained in your self-perception. It becomes part of your identity and part of what you project to others. So the best thing you can do for yourself in losing your loser attitude is to: (A) quit being so hard on yourself; (B) quit feeling sorry for yourself; and (C) work on your self-esteem.

You need to bolster the energy you’re giving off by focusing on your best qualities; activities that you enjoy, and areas where you feel the best about yourself. Do what you need to do to get to a better place, for example, exercise or work with a coach to counter self-defeating thoughts. Remember, people are attracted to nice guys — in many cases; they are the men who win when it comes to love in the end.

Dr. Yvonne Kristín Fulbright is a sex educator, relationship expert, columnist and founder of Sexuality Source Inc. She is the author of several books including, “Touch Me There! A Hands-On Guide to Your Orgasmic Hot Spots.”