Obama and Swine Flu
I don’t want to be picky, but I have to admit that as a fear expert I was more affected by President Obama’s statement a few weeks ago in response to the emerging swine flu threat that we should all wash our hands, then I was to Vice President Biden’s blatant misstatement about not flying on planes. Let me explain: clearly, we carry many bacteria and viruses on our hands, and in fact most of our stomach viruses as well as cold viruses are passed back and forth this way. It is hard to fault anyone for recommending hand washing, but consider that Obama’s statement carried the subliminal message that we might be carrying this virus, despite the fact that the statistical chances of that then and now remain extremely low.
The president followed that up by asking Congress for $1.5 billion to prepare us for this flu, an amount that seems totally reasonable until you consider what other health care needs it might be taken away from. Stockpiles of the anti-flu drug Tamiflu will have to be discarded if they aren’t used in 5 years, and we still have no idea what the extent of spread or severity of this swine flu virus will be. Preparing a vaccine seems wise, taking needed resources away from current pandemics like TB, HIV, or even the yearly flu does not. It is paramount that at a time when our government is considering expanding the system for health coverage, that issues of allocation and proper use of resources be at the top of the list.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been front and center during the initial stages of the swine flu outbreak, and they have been very effective at identifying and tracking the virus, somewhat less effective at explaining it in context during press conferences (this may have something to do with the nature of the beast – press conferences themselves immediately become amplified).
I have more of a bone to pick with the World Health Organization in terms of their poor conveyance of contextual information. The WHO all too often seems like “fright night” though they too have been tremendous when it comes to “boots on the ground.”
Check out my article in today’s Slate magazine about how the WHO has dealt with swine flu.
Dr. Marc Siegel is an internist and associate professor of medicine at the NYU School of Medicine. He is a FOX News medical contributor and writes a health column for the LA Times, where he examines TV and movies for medical accuracy. Dr. Siegel is the author of “False Alarm: The Truth About the Epidemic of Fear“ and “Bird Flu: Everything You Need to Know About the Next Pandemic
.” Read more at www.doctorsiegel.com
Tags: bacteria, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, flu, President Obama, Swine Flu, Tamiflu, Vice President Biden, viruses, WHO
Share








I think that press hyperventilation over swine flu fueled hysteria. Look at the scapegoats who were blamed unfairly starting with innocent little piglets! http://travelvaccineforum.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/swine-flu-scapegoats-and-sinners/
I absolutely loved this post and Thanks for providing some details and a recommendation! Nice site
Is it true that if one contracts “this” strain of H1N1 that is currently going around that should it come back in the fall, or the future for that matter, as a worse version (more deadly) then one would be less apt to get it? The logic was explained to me – by a lay person – that if you catch it now you would have an immunity to it later.
Swine flu is not a disease to scratch at. I have Lyme and Morgellons disease and the symptoms are unliveable. Approximately 200,00 people each year contact these two diseases. Most of the people with Morgellons also have Lyme disease and the CDC does not even respond to questions regarding Morgellons disease. This is not something new like Swine flu so why doesn’t any one report on these two diseases. Just go to Morgellons pictures and let’s see how many people would like to have this disease. They are disfiguring and deadly.