After reading the story about the couple in Arkansas that is suing the doctor and hospital because the wife became pregnant and miscarried after her husband had undergone a vasectomy, I understand how a patient could get upset and disappointed about having had that outcome happen to them.

But I’m also disappointed by the fact they’re rushing to sue the healthcare establishment for negligence and defamation and are seeking unspecified monetary damages.

Now, I don’t know of any procedure that is risk-free. If you go up and down the medical literature, you will always find that there is certain percentage of patients that will experience complications and/or contribute to failure rates. Therefore it seems that we must always sue any doctor who has a complication or a failure in the procedure.

My friends, if this trend continues, we will further weaken our healthcare system.

If you read medical articles written on failure rates of vasectomies, you will find that each and every one of them quotes a small but real risk of a subsequent pregnancy. I think that many folks hear “small risk” and somehow translate it into “no risk.” Failure to communicate this type of information to patients does represent a negligent act on the part of the physician, but if the information is given, then there is a mutual responsibility among doctor and patient of understanding the reality of medicine. A vasectomy can fail within the first 3 months after surgery, and even though the chances are much less, it can also fail one year after surgery.

Yes, I know I don’t have all the facts in this case, but let’s be fair about what medical science is: not always perfect.

A rather interesting headline caught my eye today—and I’m sure you’ll understand why…

“Woman Sues Victoria’s Secret, Claims Injury From Defective Thong”

A 52-year-old Los Angeles woman is suing Victoria’s Secret claiming she suffered an injury from a faulty pair of thong underwear. It seems a “design problem” caused a piece decorative metallic material to fly off the panties and into her eye as she attempted to step into the sexy skivvies. The Smoking Gun is reporting that prior to the lawsuit, officials from Victoria’s Secret had asked to see the fabric offender, but were refused by the woman’s lawyer.

Now this seems like a ridiculous claim to me. Rather than suing the company, she should be thankful that she is avoiding the possible health risks associated with sporting these skimpy undergarments.

While there is not much published research on the subject, I can offer some anecdotal research from my 25 years of seeing female patients as an OB/GYN doctor. And ladies, I’m sorry to tell you that no matter how sexy they make you feel, no matter how many panty line nightmares they have saved you from, or how “comfortable” they may be—they do increase your risk for infection!

There is indirect evidence to suggest that the chronic use of a thong can lead to a bladder infection. Remember there are many kinds of bacteria lurking in the vagina and around the anus. Also the female urethra is very short. So the presence of that thin strip of fabric in this area could increase the likelihood of bacteria exchange into the female bladder, ultimately causing a urinary tract infection to develop. Other problems that have been reported by “chronic-thong-wearing-women” are clitoral irritation, chafing or lacerations to the anus, and vaginal infections.

Now I’m not condemning thongs completely but it’s important to take into account a woman’s individual gynecological history. Remember, what might be right for some may not be right for others.